| ONLINE CONSULTATION | İstanbul Lawyer Office

THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT ANNULS THE PROVISION ON THE CONSOLIDATION OF CASES UNDER ARTICLE 166 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (HMK)

THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT ANNULS THE PROVISION ON THE CONSOLIDATION OF CASES UNDER ARTICLE 166 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (HMK)

The Nevşehir 4th Civil Court of First Instance and the Istanbul Anadolu 15th Civil Court of Peace requested the annulment of Article 166/1 of the Code of Civil Procedure (HMK), arguing that under the contested provision, when a consolidation decision is made in cases filed before courts of the same level and jurisdiction, such a decision binds the other court, and an appeal against this decision can only be made together with the final judgment. Therefore, it was asserted that the first court where the case was filed has no opportunity to review the consolidation decision. This situation was claimed to be incompatible with the principles of the rule of law, the right to legal remedies, the guarantee of a lawful judge, and the independence of the judiciary. Accordingly, the rule was alleged to violate Articles 2, 13, 36, 37, and 138 of the Constitution, and its annulment was requested. Upon evaluation, the Constitutional Court ruled that the phrase “...and this decision shall be binding on the other court...” contained in Article 166(1), second sentence, of the Code of Civil Procedure No. 6100 dated 12 January 2011, is unconstitutional and decided to annul it...

LEGAL REMEDIES AGAINST CANCER DRUGS NOT COVERED BY THE SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION (SGK) AND THE HEALTH IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNIQUÉ

LEGAL REMEDIES AGAINST CANCER DRUGS NOT COVERED BY THE SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION (SGK) AND THE HEALTH IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNIQUÉ

The fact that a drug is not included in the SUT list does not necessarily mean that the Institution will not cover its cost under any circumstances. However, in such cases, a legal process must be initiated to request reimbursement. Even if the drug in use is not listed, the patient may apply to the Social Security Institution (SGK), and if the application is rejected, a lawsuit against SGK may be filed with a request for an interim injunction. If the interim injunction is granted, the cost of the drug can be covered by SGK throughout the treatment period...

PILOT JUDGMENT BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT ON ADDITIONAL (EXCESS) DAMAGES

PILOT JUDGMENT BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT ON ADDITIONAL (EXCESS) DAMAGES

In its decision dated 8 July 2025 and numbered 2024/41763, the Constitutional Court evaluated claims concerning the loss of value of receivables arising from disputes between private legal entities due to inflation, taking into account previous Court of Cassation (Yargıtay) rulings, within the scope of the right to property and the right to an effective remedy.   As a result of this assessment, the Court held that there is no effective legal remedy available regarding claims for additional (excess) damages, that Article 122 of the Turkish Code of Obligations (Law No. 6098) does not provide adequate protection against the loss of value of receivables caused by inflation, and that the existing case law has failed to offer an effective solution to this legal issue. Consequently, the Court ruled that the right to property (Article 35 of the Constitution) and the right to an effective remedy (Article 40) had been violated. This decision was published in the Official Gazette No. 33032 on 29 September 2025...

RENT DETERMINATION LAWSUIT AND PROCEDURES FOLLOWING THE JUDGEMENT

RENT DETERMINATION LAWSUIT AND PROCEDURES FOLLOWING THE JUDGEMENT

WHAT IS A RENT DETERMINATION LAWSUIT UNDER ARTICLE 344/3 OF THE TURKISH CODE OF OBLIGATIONS NO. 6098? Regardless of whether the parties have reached an agreement on this matter, in lease agreements lasting more than five years, or renewed after five years, and at the end of each subsequent five-year period, the rent applicable for the new rental year shall be determined by the judge in accordance with the rate of change based on the twelve-month average of the consumer price index, the condition of the leased property, and comparable rental values, ensuring fairness and equity. Both the tenant and the landlord may file a rent determination lawsuit for residential and roofed commercial premises...

LAWSUIT FOR  COMPENSATION  DUE TO UNLAWFUL USE OF PROPERTY

LAWSUIT FOR COMPENSATION DUE TO UNLAWFUL USE OF PROPERTY

  Ecrimisil (unlawful occupation compensation) originates mainly from Article 995 of the Turkish Civil Code. Accordingly, a person who is not in good faith and possesses a movable or immovable property is obliged to compensate the owner (the true right holder) for the damages caused and for the benefits obtained or neglected to obtain.In brief, it is a type of compensation that a non-possessor owner can claim from a possessor who does not have ownership rights. As Uzunpınar Tüfek Law Firm, acting as a real estate lawyer in Istanbul, we protect our clients’ rights and apply the most effective legal strategies in ecrimisil cases. An ecrimisil lawsuit (compensation for unlawful occupation) may be filed together with an action for prevention of interference (actio negatoria) or a title deed cancellation and registration lawsuit, or it may be filed independently...

 LAWSUIT FOR PERMİSSİON TO SHOW THE LEASED PROPERTY

LAWSUIT FOR PERMİSSİON TO SHOW THE LEASED PROPERTY

Court of Cassation 3rd Civil Chamber, File No: 2024/4081, Decision No: 2025/1441, Date: 10.03.2025 With its Decision Regarding the Resolution of Conflicts Between Regional Courts of Appeal, the Court Ruled That There is no Legal Obstacle to Granting a Preliminary İnjunction in Lawsuits Filed for the Permission to Show the Leased Property...

Penalty Clause In Case The Contractor Falls Into Default On The Deliverment Of The Work (ÇEVİRİ)

Penalty Clause In Case The Contractor Falls Into Default On The Deliverment Of The Work (ÇEVİRİ)

  A penalty clause is dependent on the existence of the principal obligation, in other words, it is an accessory obligation connected to the principal obligation. This is because the penalty clause secures the principal obligation. The penalty clause can be stipulated either in the main contract or in a separate contract concluded subsequently. The penalty clause can be the payment of a sum of money or it can also involve obligations in property other than money. In accordance with Article 182/I of the TCC and the principle of freedom of contract, the parties to the contract may freely agree on the penalty clause and its amount. However, pursuant to Article 182/III of the TCC, if the judge deems the amount of the penalty clause agreed upon by the parties to be excessive, the judge shall reduce it ex officio. Conversely, Article 182/III of the TCC In accordance with Article 22, if the contractor is a merchant, a penalty clause cannot be reduced on the grounds that it is excessive. However, this rule applies if the penalty clause is detrimental to the merchant contractor and violates morality and etiquette.  ..

Bodily harm (ÇEVİRİ)

Bodily harm (ÇEVİRİ)

BODILY HARM A. THE CONCEPT OF BODILY HARMBodily harm is not clearly defined in the TCC. In legal terminology, bodily harm means "damage inflicted on the human body (body) as a result of a tortious act, … bodily harm." The concept of bodily harm encompasses both the violation of a person's physical integrity and their mental integrity, in other words, their mental health. Bodily harm resulting from a violation of physical integrity encompasses the violation of both a person's physical integrity and their mental integrity.The first element for bodily harm to occur is the existence of the harm. Injury, disability, mental distress, or similar must occur as a result of an unlawful act. However, injury, mental distress, or similar conditions alone are not sufficient for the harm to occur. The aforementioned reasons must also include a decrease in property, or a decrease in property in the future. Both of these elements must be present simultaneously. In short, if there is no decrease or potential decrease in a person's assets in the event of injury, the concept of bodily injury does not arise...

Frequently Asked Questions About Apostille (ÇEVİRİ)

Frequently Asked Questions About Apostille (ÇEVİRİ)

QUESTIONS ABOUT APOSTILLE For a document or decision obtained from a foreign country's official authorities to be valid in Turkey, the foreign decision (e.g., court decision) or document (e.g., notarial deed) must be certified (attested) by the Turkish consulate or authority in the country where it was issued. For example, for an administrative or judicial document obtained from Cuba to be valid in Turkey, this official document must be certified by the Turkish Embassy or Consulate in Cuba.The reverse is also true. In other words, for a court decision or document obtained in Turkey to be valid in a foreign country (e.g., Germany), it must be certified by the Turkish consulate of that country. For example, if a notarial document obtained from Turkey is intended to be used in Canada, this notarial document must be certified by the Canadian Embassy in Turkey.Here are some countries regarding the validity of these foreign documents and decisions in other countries: In order to abolish the requirement for certification by their own foreign missions, they prepared a multinational agreement called the "Hague Convention on the Abolition of the Requirement for Legalization of Foreign Offi..