| ONLINE CONSULTATION | İstanbul Lawyer Office

THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT ANNULS THE PROVISION ON THE CONSOLIDATION OF CASES UNDER ARTICLE 166 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (HMK)

THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT ANNULS THE PROVISION ON THE CONSOLIDATION OF CASES UNDER ARTICLE 166 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (HMK)

The Nevşehir 4th Civil Court of First Instance and the Istanbul Anadolu 15th Civil Court of Peace requested the annulment of Article 166/1 of the Code of Civil Procedure (HMK), arguing that under the contested provision, when a consolidation decision is made in cases filed before courts of the same level and jurisdiction, such a decision binds the other court, and an appeal against this decision can only be made together with the final judgment. Therefore, it was asserted that the first court where the case was filed has no opportunity to review the consolidation decision. This situation was claimed to be incompatible with the principles of the rule of law, the right to legal remedies, the guarantee of a lawful judge, and the independence of the judiciary. Accordingly, the rule was alleged to violate Articles 2, 13, 36, 37, and 138 of the Constitution, and its annulment was requested. Upon evaluation, the Constitutional Court ruled that the phrase “...and this decision shall be binding on the other court...” contained in Article 166(1), second sentence, of the Code of Civil Procedure No. 6100 dated 12 January 2011, is unconstitutional and decided to annul it...

PILOT JUDGMENT BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT ON ADDITIONAL (EXCESS) DAMAGES

PILOT JUDGMENT BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT ON ADDITIONAL (EXCESS) DAMAGES

In its decision dated 8 July 2025 and numbered 2024/41763, the Constitutional Court evaluated claims concerning the loss of value of receivables arising from disputes between private legal entities due to inflation, taking into account previous Court of Cassation (Yargıtay) rulings, within the scope of the right to property and the right to an effective remedy.   As a result of this assessment, the Court held that there is no effective legal remedy available regarding claims for additional (excess) damages, that Article 122 of the Turkish Code of Obligations (Law No. 6098) does not provide adequate protection against the loss of value of receivables caused by inflation, and that the existing case law has failed to offer an effective solution to this legal issue. Consequently, the Court ruled that the right to property (Article 35 of the Constitution) and the right to an effective remedy (Article 40) had been violated. This decision was published in the Official Gazette No. 33032 on 29 September 2025...

Matters to be taken into consideration when applying to the Constitutional Court (ÇEVİRİ)

Matters to be taken into consideration when applying to the Constitutional Court (ÇEVİRİ)

IMPORTANT POINTS TO CONSIDER WHEN APPLYING TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT 1. WHAT IS AN INDIVIDUAL APPLICATION?An individual application is a remedy through which anyone can seek legal remedies against any of the fundamental rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution, as covered by the European Convention on Human Rights and its additional protocols to which Turkey is a party (Protocol Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 13, and 15), all of which have been violated by public authorities...